Iran Review > Iran's Nuclear Program
War or Agreement: No Third Option for Iran's Nuclear Program
Tuesday, April 21, 2015

Maysam Behravesh
More pressure on Iran on the account of its nuclear program will only make Iran more adamant and will not be ensued with that kind of compromise that Netanyahu and his allies consider “good deal.” Such state of affairs will only mean escalation of tensions and the rising possibility of war.

Who Will Win?: What Will a Possible Deal between Iran and E3+3 Bring About?
Saturday, April 18, 2015

Behzad Saberi
On 31 July 2006, adopting resolution 1696 under Chapter VII of the UN Charter, the Security Council demanded that “Iran suspend all enrichment-related and reprocessing activities, including research and development”. The Council expressed its conviction that “such suspension, as well as full, verified Iranian compliance with the IAEA Board of Governor’s requirements, would contribute to a diplomatic, negotiated solution that guaranteed Iran’s nuclear program was for exclusively peaceful purposes”.

Russia and the Challenge of Iran's Comprehensive Nuclear Agreement
Thursday, April 16, 2015

Alireza Noori
Although Russia’s deputy foreign minister and top nuclear negotiator, Sergei Ryabkov, lauded the role played by Russian President Vladimir Putin in the achievement of the agreement , and Andrey Klimov, Deputy Chairman of the Committee on International Affairs of the Council of the Russian Federation, noted that reaching the agreement would have been impossible without Russia, in reality, Moscow played an insignificant role in these round of nuclear talks. There is no doubt that this situation is not favored by Russia, especially under conditions that West is trying to isolate this country.

Addressing Swiss Statement Criticism, Great Challenges for Final Agreement
Wednesday, April 15, 2015

Mohammad Hassan Daryaei
It should be noted that like any other country, Iran has its own complexities and domestic political rivalries and such rivalries usually reach their peak when it comes to the sensitive issue of the nuclear talks. Perhaps, one of the most important challenges facing the Iranian nuclear negotiating team is to convince domestic political factions and groups, so that, there would be necessary consensus inside the country for the continuation of the negotiations until a decisive result is reached and the final Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action is formulated.

Lausanne Statement: Positive and Negative Views
Sunday, April 12, 2015

Hamid Ahmadi
Existence of anxious opponents, along with a wide spectrum of those who support the Lausanne agreement, is quite natural. Just in the same way that the support accorded to the Iranian nuclear negotiators can motivate them and keep their spirits high, domestic opponents can be considered a good asset on which negotiators can reckon in their resistance against illegal demands of the opposite negotiating parties, especially the United States.

Lausanne Agreement, A Turning Point in Iran's Soft Power
Saturday, April 11, 2015

Mahmoud Reza Golshanpazhooh
The recent release of the text of an agreement reached between Iran and the P5+1 group, also known as EU3+3, was the finishing line of marathon nuclear talks between Iran and the six countries. It was also the beginning of a long period of practice in mutual trust.

JCPOA, An Opportunity for Iran to Strive toward Large-Scale Goals
Tuesday, April 7, 2015

Abbas Maleki
In December 2013 and at the end of another round of nuclear talks between Iran and the member states of the so-called P5+1 group, the negotiating sides decided that to find solutions for the comprehensive settlement of Iran's nuclear case, they should hold meetings in order to achieve two final goal.

How Lausanne Agreement Can Affect Domestic Order in Iran?
Sunday, April 5, 2015

Mohammad Mansouri Boroujeni
Continuation of the Lausanne agreement will mean that the United States has changed its strategy toward Iran on the basis of recognizing the reality of the Islamic Revolution, and has decided to replace hostile measures aimed at eliminating the Islamic Republic in favor of hostility aimed at reducing the degree to which Iran can meet its interests. In this way, doing away with external threats to totality of the Islamic Establishment will provide the country with a good opportunity to promote the freedom-based tradition that has been stipulated by the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

A Nuclear Deal Could Change Iran’s Understanding of 'Strategic Stability' in the Region
Friday, April 3, 2015

Kayhan Barzegar
A nuclear deal could change Iran's understanding of strategic instability from the U.S. policies in the region, subsequently leading to increased regional interactions.

Five Steps to Nuclear Final
Sunday, March 29, 2015

Hassan Mohammadi
In fact, all parties have reached a consensus over a one-stage agreement and maintain that it would facilitate a final deal. However, pressures mounted by the US Congress have forced the American side to seek a written understanding, even in a few pages, to feed it to the Congress and keep its members content until the deadline. The Iranian side, on the other hand, will most probably issue a press release about the meetings that have taken place among foreign ministers of seven countries with no mention of the general outline of the negotiations.

طراحی و توسعه آگاه‌سیستم